Comments for Plastic/Blog

Comment on On Readability by Emanuele DelBono

Emanuele DelBono — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:08:01 +0000

My opinion is: the second on is more readable for a human, but as a developer I prefer the first one since I can read it faster and I (as every developer) knows what Assert.AreEqual do.
I will write a post on this.

Comment on On Readability by pm

pm — Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:48:15 +0000

I prefer the first one. It’s shorter then the second.
And you should read it faster.

Comment on On Readability by Stefano

Stefano — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:25:47 +0000

Concordo con Luka (de gustibus..), sia a livello di leggibilità che di scrittura

Comment on On Readability by Gian MAria

Gian MAria — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:19:39 +0000

I prefer the second one, but I usally write

Assert.That(result, Is.EqualTo(5));

because it is really readable, but with SharpTestEx you can write

result.Should().Be.EqualTo(5);

That is the best

alk.

Comment on On Readability by Michiel Vlootman

Michiel Vlootman — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:35:41 +0000

I find that the 2nd option (Assert.That) is not only more readable, it also types more natural when creating the test.

Comment on On Readability by Luca Minudel

Luca Minudel — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:42:55 +0000

se mi chiedi di scegliere, ecco qui:

personalmente a me risulta piu leggibile il primo e lo trovo piu semplice.

il secondo lo trovo piu complesso e non riesco a vedere dei vantaggi (es. incapsulare/astrarre dettagli implementativi che qui non interessano).

comunque gli digerisco bene entrambi senza mal di stomaco

Comment on Does C# becaming old? by Emanuele DelBono

Emanuele DelBono — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:12:24 +0000

I’ve just give it a look in some blog post. It is a DSL, right? Do you use it in some context?

Comment on Does C# becaming old? by superbecio

superbecio — Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:05:18 +0000

Have you seen the boo language?

Comment on Removing “if” by Emanuele DelBono

Emanuele DelBono — Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:18:25 +0000

Surely the construction must be moved away from the method, like I said in the post I usually fill the dictionary in a “Initialize” method and I put the data in a resource or in a database.

Comment on Removing “if” by Ken Egozi

Ken Egozi — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:54:50 +0000

I really like this approach. The only things I’d change are moving the Dictionary construction to happen once (e.g. within a static field with static initialization), and perhaps use object initializer to make it a bit shorter.

Others like this too. see my post http://www.kenegozi.com/blog/2007/09/01/dictionary-of-actions-instead-of-a-switch.aspx and the ones it links to (credit to Luca Bolognese)